Friday, September 7, 2012

Plagiarism


2 Chronicles 28:1
Ahaz was twenty years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem sixteen years. Unlike David his father, he did not do what was right in the eyes of the LORD.

Senator Tito Sotto’s name linked to plagiarism hit a second time this week. His controversial speech against the Reproductive Health bill was found to be an exact translation of Robert Kennedy’s 1966 speech. Before this, he was already on hot seat for copying from a US-based blogger without attribution. But what is disturbing in both instances is that he never saw it as wrong. He even considered himself as cyber-bullied.  To his detractors, he demanded answers to population control and abortion issues. But to the Filipino people, his excuses to plagiarism are wanting. He may continue to ignore the ethical argument here, but will it  make him right?

The first verse in King Ahaz’ account says ‘he did not do what was right in the eyes of the Lord’. By implication, we can say that all he did was what was good in his eyes and maybe everyone else. He indulged in idolatry, copying the kings of Israel; he sacrificed his sons in the fire following the ways of the nations around him; and, he was unfaithful to the Lord as the rest of Judah were. At one point, he even offered to the gods who defeated them, for he thought, ‘Since the gods of Aram helped them, I will sacrifice to them so they will help me.’  It seemed right, looked right, many-said right, in-Aram’s-record right, even felt alright - - but because it wasn’t God-right, he was wrong. Sadly, in God’s time to execute His justice, he became even more unfaithful. Unlike King David who readily repented at first rebuke, Ahaz himself shut the Lord’s temple doors as his last resort.

Senator Sotto argued there was no law against plagiarism. His lawyers were obviously on his side. What surprised me was Senate President Enrile’s defense that many views on earth were also copies from others. Even the word ‘democracy’. Shall we take their word for it? BUT shall we also rally to the other side because the Netizens are in and ‘we feel smart already’ by sharing their ground? Have we even once asked what God really has to say about this? Don’t you think it falls under the ‘Do not steal’ and ‘Love One Another’ commandments? And why do you think God’s anger burn against idolatry and ungratefulness? Isn’t it because He was robbed the glory due His? In His eyes, we’re all guilty here. Now will we do what is God-right?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Plagiarism


2 Chronicles 28:1
Ahaz was twenty years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem sixteen years. Unlike David his father, he did not do what was right in the eyes of the LORD.

Senator Tito Sotto’s name linked to plagiarism hit a second time this week. His controversial speech against the Reproductive Health bill was found to be an exact translation of Robert Kennedy’s 1966 speech. Before this, he was already on hot seat for copying from a US-based blogger without attribution. But what is disturbing in both instances is that he never saw it as wrong. He even considered himself as cyber-bullied.  To his detractors, he demanded answers to population control and abortion issues. But to the Filipino people, his excuses to plagiarism are wanting. He may continue to ignore the ethical argument here, but will it  make him right?

The first verse in King Ahaz’ account says ‘he did not do what was right in the eyes of the Lord’. By implication, we can say that all he did was what was good in his eyes and maybe everyone else. He indulged in idolatry, copying the kings of Israel; he sacrificed his sons in the fire following the ways of the nations around him; and, he was unfaithful to the Lord as the rest of Judah were. At one point, he even offered to the gods who defeated them, for he thought, ‘Since the gods of Aram helped them, I will sacrifice to them so they will help me.’  It seemed right, looked right, many-said right, in-Aram’s-record right, even felt alright - - but because it wasn’t God-right, he was wrong. Sadly, in God’s time to execute His justice, he became even more unfaithful. Unlike King David who readily repented at first rebuke, Ahaz himself shut the Lord’s temple doors as his last resort.

Senator Sotto argued there was no law against plagiarism. His lawyers were obviously on his side. What surprised me was Senate President Enrile’s defense that many views on earth were also copies from others. Even the word ‘democracy’. Shall we take their word for it? BUT shall we also rally to the other side because the Netizens are in and ‘we feel smart already’ by sharing their ground? Have we even once asked what God really has to say about this? Don’t you think it falls under the ‘Do not steal’ and ‘Love One Another’ commandments? And why do you think God’s anger burn against idolatry and ungratefulness? Isn’t it because He was robbed the glory due His? In His eyes, we’re all guilty here. Now will we do what is God-right?